Having spent the past twelve months investigating Codex Alimentarius, I am deeply disturbed by the almost total lack of awareness (or even interest) with regard to the implications of this pernicious global Commission, particularly amongst those most affected by the excesses of this restrictive legislation. In the words of the National Health Federation[i], the aims and objectives of Codex Alimentarius are as follows: * Only low-potency, “me too” supplements available that will do nothing for your health. * All or most foods genetically-modified. * Beneficial supplements unavailable or sold by prescription only. For many people, this agenda is so outrageous, they cannot believe such goals are achievable; yet this may well be the reality as soon as 31st December 2009, if the Codex Alimentarius Commission continues to disregard input from those who offer a counter perspective to the combined forces of Big Farmer & Big Pharma.
3 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post, TrackBack URI
How is it possible that the peoples rights of food choices are taken away.
This is an absolute nightmare
Terrible that loads of people swallowing evereything they dont know…
Plz wake up before it’s too late!
Dear Ian R Crane,
Highly interesting and frightening.
You mention many books, authors and reports. Do you publish a llist of these?
As a homeopathic doctor I know about the powers that you describe. Homeopathy often is highly effective (much higher rates than the 5% you mention for the allopathic industry).
Every scientific research that proves the effect of homeopathy is attacked and deminished in a organised reaction world wide.
The strongest example is the publication in The Lancet in 2006. Shang et al. (2005). ‘Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects?’ Lancet, 366:726–32.
Their conclusion: homeopathy does not work. And The Lancet added an editorial: “Now we do not ever take homeopathy serious anymore”. But the study was seriously and scientifically critisized some months earlier at its first publication in Switzerland ( http://biblio.parlament.ch/e-docs/139404.pdf pages 83-86). This was not mentioned in The Lancet; they needed to go with the big companies that pay their bills.
Recently the pre-publication critics where augmented with an extensive scientifical publication:
The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2008; doi.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.015
The press wordlwide only publishes only information according to The Lancet; the true story never was published in the papers and on TV.
I will recomand your video to my homeopathic organisation. Thanks and all the best, Anton Kramer